JPG to WebP
Convert JPG photos into modern WebP images with browser-side processing.
Loading Smart Logic...
Quick Tip
Select the JPG you want to convert.
About This Tool
Why use JPG to WebP?
Re-encode a JPG as WebP at quality 80. WebP's compression is more efficient than JPEG's at the same perceived quality, so the same photograph typically comes out 25 to 35 per cent smaller with no visible difference on screen.
This is worth doing when images are what makes your pages heavy, which is true of most sites. It is not worth doing to an image you plan to keep editing: the JPEG has already been compressed once, and re-encoding it to WebP compresses it a second time. Always convert from the highest quality original you have rather than from a file that has been through several rounds already.
Key Benefits
Smaller than JPEG
WebP's compression is more efficient at the same perceived quality, usually saving a quarter to a third of the file size.
Faster pages
Lighter photographs shorten Largest Contentful Paint, which is measured directly as part of page experience.
Converted locally
Decoding and re-encoding both happen in your browser, so the photograph is never uploaded.
How to use JPG to WebP
- 1
Select the JPG you want to convert.
- 2
Convert; the image is re-encoded as WebP at quality 80.
- 3
Compare the preview and the file size.
- 4
Download the .webp and serve it in place of the JPEG.
Best use cases
Shrink product photography on an online store.
Cut the image weight of a blog or news site.
Meet a performance budget without lowering visible quality.
Prepare a batch of photos for a site that serves WebP.
JPG to WebP FAQs
How much smaller is WebP than JPEG?
Usually 25 to 35 per cent at the same perceived quality. The exact saving depends on the image — detailed photographs gain the most.
Does converting lose quality?
Slightly. The JPEG has already been compressed once and the WebP compresses it again. At quality 80 this is not visible at normal viewing size, but always convert from the best original you have.
Will older browsers show the image?
Every current browser supports WebP. Only genuinely ancient versions do not, and they are far below the threshold where a fallback is worth maintaining.
Should I convert JPG or PNG to WebP first?
PNG usually gains more in absolute terms, because PNGs on the web are often several times larger than they need to be. Convert both if you can.
Related Images Tools
More free images tools that work well alongside jpg to webp.